Submitted by Himangsu Sekhar Pal on Fri, 09/07/2018 - 00:28
"If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him." – Voltaire
"A Boss in Heaven is the best excuse for a boss on earth; therefore if God did exist, he would have to be abolished.” - Mikhail Bakunin
God cannot be so easily abolished, because even an atheist is now seeing god where there is no mention of god. Below is the story:
Athiest1
Submitted by Himangsu Sekhar Pal on Tue, 07/31/2018 - 02:56
In one YouTube presentation the question discussed was whether Atheism was Impervious to Evidence. The following thread is from that presentation.
Atheist1
No, atheism is not impervious to evidence. All you have to do is provide evidence for a god, to date nobody has done that, not even once. There has never been any testable, falsifiable, repeatable, demonstrable, concrete, independently verifiable evidence presented for any deity ever.
Me to Atheist1
Submitted by Himangsu Sekhar Pal on Fri, 07/06/2018 - 09:24
If an entity is emergent, then in general that will imply these three things:
1) The emergent entity cannot have any existence prior to its emergence;
2) The emergent entity (A) cannot emerge from just anything or everything or nothing; it can emerge from some particular entity or entities only (B); and
3) B must pre-exist before the emergence of A.
Submitted by Himangsu Sekhar Pal on Fri, 05/04/2018 - 09:42
In one YouTube comment thread one atheist has asked this question: ‘Who created the creator? Oh, what's that? The creator doesn't need a creator?'
He has also written that if the creator doesn't need a creator, then that would be special pleading. He has also stated that if the creator doesn't need a creator then by extension the universe, which created us, also doesn't need one. So, why should we bother conjuring up an additional step? He has also asked: is it turtles all the way?
Here I enter in the thread.
Pages
Recent comments