Submitted by Himangsu Sekhar Pal on Sat, 05/15/2021 - 09:01
If it were possible for a human being to be simultaneously present in New York and London, then the distance between these two cities would be zero for that human being. But, for all the other human beings, this distance would remain the same as before.
Submitted by Himangsu Sekhar Pal on Mon, 03/01/2021 - 09:50
Part I
Two reasons can be given as to why an entity may be spaceless and timeless:
1) Reason A: If the entity is not within any space and time, then it will naturally be spaceless and timeless. We can also say that it will be spaceless and timeless by default;
2) Reason B: If the entity is placed within some space and time, and if it is forcefully deprived of space and time, then also it will become spaceless and timeless.
Submitted by Himangsu Sekhar Pal on Sun, 12/25/2016 - 10:50
Atheists do have some deep basic convictions. When science does in no way contradict these basic convictions of them, they are whole-heartedly with science. However if any scientific theory contradicts in any way any single basic conviction of them, they do not hesitate to go against science.
The two most basic convictions of the atheists are:
• There is nothing supernatural; and
• Whatever exists, exists within space-time only. So nothing can exist outside space-time.
Submitted by Himangsu Sekhar Pal on Mon, 09/12/2016 - 02:33
It is not that only believers are close-minded; there are lots of atheists and non-believers who are close-minded as well. I will give just one example here.
Submitted by Himangsu Sekhar Pal on Mon, 07/25/2016 - 03:15
Recently I put the following question to an atheist:
‘Can you name a single thing in nature that has the property of hardness, but that is not hard itself?’
His reply was this:
‘That doesn’t make sense.’
Then again I wrote to him:
Pages
Recent comments